​

In this issue:
​

  • Erica & I want to edit you
  • Why are we getting bored with content?
  • The Verge thinks SEOs drive Ferarris
  • U.S. passes AI bill
  • How to build an SEO team
  • Jay Acunzo is fed up with AI

​

​

Let’s go!

​
Coming soon:

​

Erica Schneider & Tommy Walker Edit-a-Thon

Count down to 2023-11-07T18:00:00.000Z​

​

​

“I HAVE AN IDEA!!!”
​
“IT LITERALLY CAME TO ME IN A DREAM!”
​
This was the message I got from Erica at 9:38 Am on October 18th.
​
“Tommy and Erica’s ‘Edit-a-thon’
​
A half-day sprint where we edit and explain edits and whatever else seems fun and involves the audience.
​
People can tune in and tune out but it’ll be live for X hours…”
​
“HOLY SH*T I LOVE IT!”
​
So this is how it’s going down…
​
On Tuesday @ 1pm est / 10am PST, Erica and I will be diving into 6 audience-submitted pieces and doing deep edits while walking through our thought processes and answering audience questions live.
​
We’ll also have the people being edited come onto the stream and get 2:1 coaching as we go through their piece.

​

If you’d like to have your article featured, click the button below.

​

​I’d like to have my article edited please

​Add the Edit-a-Thon to your Google calendar here​

​ical and Outlook calendar here​

​

​

​

Top of mind:

No real big insights this week.
​
My son had his 13th birthday this past Tuesday, I’m at a conference, and planning out the next couple editions of this newsletter.

​
Something I’ve been thinking about, as I know you’ve been too, is “The Playbook.”

​
You know the one:

  • Write the blog to
  • Promote the ebook to
  • Capture the email, to
  • Sell the thing, then
  • Start a YouTube to
  • Repurpose as a podcast to
  • Chop it up to a million pieces to
  • Share it everywhere so you can
  • Get people to the blog and
  • Repeat the process.

I’ve been asked a few times this week what I think about it, and quite honestly, I’m torn.

​
One part of me says that “The Playbook” is overdone to the point of clichΓ©, and another part of me questions if it’s the playbook, or are we just bored?

​
I’ll fully admit that I am.

​
But Devil’s advocate, is boredom enough to change things up if it works?

​
I think about how much B2B marketers have been hemming and hawing (again, myself included) about how things haven’t changed since 2009, but then I think about another format that’s been running the same playbook for 8 decades.

Report: US TV and OOH Ad Spend Have Peaked - Marketing Charts

With little exception, the TV advertising model has remained largely unchanged since ads were introduced on July 1st, 1941.

​
You have the show, the ad runs within the commercial breaks.

​
There have been a few innovations, like sponsored TV shows alΓ‘ The Colgate Comedy Hour in 1951, or Ninja Turtles and every Saturday morning cartoon created explicitly with the purpose of selling toys.

​
But for the most part, the mechanism of advertising on TV has been largely unchanged.

​
Even product placement predates TV by 55 years, when the LumiΓ¨re brothers, featured soap in their film β€œWashing Day in Switzerland.”

​
Yet, look at the numbers in the graph above.

​
Ad spending has been mostly flat since 2014, and even at its lowest in 2020, hasn’t dipped below 61 Billion dollars.

​
That’s to say TV’s “Playbook” has been the same for over 80 years because that’s what works.

​
However…

​
Even though the playbook remains the same, the execution has not.

​
Standout TV ads have always been in tune with the zeitgeist.

​
Consider this Pepsi ad with Britney Spears from 2001.


​

​
This came out at a time when MTV was at the height of its popularity, and music videos were the most popular form of entertainment for Pepsi’s target demographic.

​
It stood out among other advertising while fitting in with what people were consuming.

​
What I’m getting at is this…

​
Maybe “The Playbook” is tired. But then again, maybe it isn’t.

​
There are only so many reliable ways to reach our customers and email and blogs will probably be the best of them.

​
Maybe most of us are bored because we’ve been watching the rise of creators like Mr. Beast or Casey Neistat, or Michelle Khare over the last several years, and we feel there’s a gap between what they can do on their own and what we’re allowed to do.

​
I don’t know the answer, but I think we need to encourage leadership to look for inspiration beyond what’s happening in their corner of the industry and look to what people are consuming in their off hours.
​
As clichΓ© as it is, our competitors are not the competition.

​
It’s everything else.

​
That’s as terrifying as it is exciting, because while it means we have to step into the unknown, it also means we can experiment with new things that get us excited to open our laptops.
​
That’s just me though, what do you think?
​

​

Thank you to our sponsor aHrefs

οΏΌ

Find the issues that prevent your site from ranking. aHrefs webmaster tools scans up to 5,000 pages website for 100 technical SEO issues that may prevent your site from ranking, absolutely free.

​

What’s on our radar?

πŸ€– The White House’s executive order on AI​

🏎 The Verge thinks SEOs all drive Ferraris ​

🀬 Jay Acunzo is fed up with AI​

πŸ€“ How to build an SEO Team
​
🎭 How to create dramatic characters​

Let’s get social

Wil Reynolds - There's levels to "being good" at what you do. Next time you think you are "really good" at your job, stop for a sec and ask yourself this...  What do I actively do to know if there's a level (or 3) above me?  See in sports you know the levels, there's no A ball MVP that is satisfied staying in the farm system, pros is the goal. Heisman trophy is good, NFL MVP is the goal. Heck, MVP of your NFL team is a better goal than Heisman, right? In marketing it's easy to stay in your small pond and act as if there aren't levels. How do you evaluate the landscape on a regular basis?  I like surrounding myself with people who show me levels, and help to humble me and make me work harder. Here's to a few of the people whom have done that in the last 4 months. Thanks for the humble pie! :)  AI - πŸ’ŽJP HoleckaπŸ’ŽBritney Muller Michael King SEO - Carrie Rose Paid Martech - Ari Monkarsh Local SEO - David Mihm

I felt like my knowledge had peaked for quite a while, and as a result, the work I was producing felt stale.
​
At some point, I started actively seeking out creators who were far beyond where I was and I started dissecting what made their work…work.
​
This is a great reminder from Wil to continue doing this if you want to keep your skills sharp.

From “The Vault”

Erica Schneider - Too much going on. Structure doesn't flow intuitively, or answer search intent up top.

Eric Schneider’s episode of The Cutting Room is by far the most popular, and there’s a reason why.
​
In this article, she digs into structural, developmental, and content edits masterfully and gives feedback that is lovingly blunt.
​
There’s a reason why we’re doing an Edit-a-Thon together.
​​
​
​Read the article​

Enter the Edit-a-Thon

​

Get edited by myself and Erica & join us live for some 2:1 coaching.

I’d like to have my article edited please

See you in the next one ✌️

profile image

Tommy Walker | The Content Studio

​LinkedIn | YouTube | Book a 1-on-1​

​

One Washington Street suite 3108, Dover, NH 03820
​Unsubscribe Β· Preferences​